Author: Rowan Ellis

  • How to Leverage Networking for Career Advancement

    Understanding the value of networking

    Networking is not a side activity reserved for extroverts with perfect calendars. It is a practical way to learn where opportunities appear, how teams actually hire, and which skills are moving from “nice to have” to essential. The best networks usually grow through repeated, useful contact rather than a single memorable handshake.

    Career research from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics is a useful reminder that occupations evolve over time, which means relationships matter when job titles, tools, and expectations shift. Networking helps you notice those shifts early.

    A helpful way to think about it: networking is less about collecting contacts and more about building enough trust that people will remember your work when something relevant comes up.

    Building your network online and offline

    There are two channels worth maintaining at the same time. Offline, that means colleagues, industry events, alumni groups, volunteer work, and professional associations. Online, it means LinkedIn, niche communities, and thoughtful participation in discussions where your field already gathers.

    If you want a broader view of how professional relationships shape careers, social capital is a useful concept: the value of who you know often comes from trust, reciprocity, and shared context, not volume alone.

    For many professionals, the simplest starting point is to reconnect with people already in your orbit:

    • former teammates,
    • classmates and alumni,
    • vendors, clients, and partners,
    • speakers or attendees you meet at events,
    • people whose work you already respect.

    That approach is usually easier, and more effective, than trying to begin with strangers and a polished elevator pitch that nobody asked for.

    Tips for effective networking

    The strongest networking habits are usually unglamorous. Be specific about what you do, what you are learning, and where you want to go next. Ask better questions than “What do you do?” and listen long enough to remember the answer.

    A simple structure works well:

    1. Introduce yourself in one sentence.
    2. Share one current priority or challenge.
    3. Ask one thoughtful question about the other person’s work.
    4. Look for one way to be useful later.

    When you need examples of strong professional communication, LinkedIn’s help center has practical guidance on profiles, connections, and outreach. The advice is basic, but basics are often where people slip.

    Practical networking also means managing your energy. A short, focused conversation that leads to a follow-up is better than a long event where you speak to ten people and remember none of them by Monday.

    Following up after networking events

    Most networking value is created after the event, not during it. A good follow-up message should be prompt, specific, and easy to answer. Mention where you met, reference one detail from the conversation, and keep the next step simple.

    For example:

    It was good to meet you at the conference yesterday. I appreciated your point about team leadership in hybrid work. If you are open to it, I would enjoy continuing the conversation over a short call next week.

    That is more effective than sending a vague “great to connect” note and hoping memory does the rest.

    If you want a clean reminder system, organize contacts into a simple list with three fields: where you met, what you discussed, and when you last followed up. A basic spreadsheet is often enough.

    Leveraging LinkedIn for networking

    LinkedIn works best when it supports real professional relationships instead of pretending to replace them. Use your profile to explain what you do, what problems you solve, and what kind of roles or collaborations you are open to. Then use posts and comments to stay visible without becoming noisy.

    A few useful practices:

    • write a headline that says more than a job title,
    • keep your experience section current,
    • connect with a short note when appropriate,
    • comment thoughtfully on posts from people in your field,
    • share work that shows your thinking, not just your output.

    If you are building your presence as part of a wider career strategy, it can help to review the About page and contact page on a site like this one as a reminder that people respond better when they can quickly understand who is behind the message and how to reach them.

    A practical networking routine

    Frequency Action Purpose
    Weekly Reach out to one contact or comment meaningfully on one post Stay visible
    Monthly Attend one event or online meetup Meet new people
    Quarterly Review key contacts and follow up Keep relationships warm

    A routine like this is modest, which is the point. Consistency usually beats dramatic bursts of effort.

    Professionals talking and exchanging ideas at a networking event
    A professional networking event can create the kind of conversations that lead to future opportunities.

    Useful takeaway

    Networking helps career advancement when it is steady, specific, and generous. Build relationships before you need them, follow up with purpose, and use LinkedIn as a bridge rather than a billboard. The result is not instant magic. It is something more durable: a career with more doors in it.

    For readers who want a deeper view of job mobility and career change patterns, the BLS occupational outlook pages and Career Outlook guidance on job changes offer a sensible place to start.

  • Training vs. Experience: What Matters Most When You Want to Progress?

    Training vs. Experience: What Matters Most When You Want to Progress?

    Training or experience? When you want to progress, the real question is how to combine both-so learning turns into performance, and experience turns into durable skills.

    Before you choose your next step, you probably ask: What will employers actually notice? When should I prioritize courses or certifications? When will on-the-job learning carry more weight? And how do I build a plan that uses both without burning time? As many career frameworks emphasize, progression works best when goals, feedback, and development activities line up (see the OECD on learning).

    In practice, skill growth is not purely “academic” or purely “situational.” Many organizations look for proof of capability-through credentials and through results-because both reduce uncertainty about how someone will perform in a real role. For background on competency-based hiring and workforce planning, the CIPD (work and skills) is a useful starting point.

    In this article, you’ll learn what employers often look for, when training tends to matter most, when experience carries more weight, and how to combine both into a simple development plan you can actually maintain.

    A professional reviewing a skills plan on a laptop at a clean desk
    A development plan is easier to act on when it connects learning to real work.

    What employers often look for

    Even when job ads mention “experience” and “training,” the underlying evaluation is usually about the same thing: evidence you can do the work in the context they’re hiring for.

    • Current capability: can you already perform key tasks?
    • Transferability: can you apply what you learned (from training) to unfamiliar situations?
    • Learning agility: can you pick up new tools, processes, or standards quickly?
    • Reliable behavior: do you collaborate, communicate, and deliver consistently?

    That’s why the debate “training vs. experience” can be misleading: most hiring decisions weigh both types of evidence according to the role’s risk and novelty.

    When training matters most

    Training tends to carry more weight when the role requires structured knowledge, specific methods, or minimum standards that are hard to verify only through day-to-day work.

    1) You’re entering a new domain or moving across functions

    If your target role uses unfamiliar tools, frameworks, or compliance-sensitive practices, courses (or guided learning) can shorten the ramp-up time. Here, training works like a faster orientation system.

    2) The organization needs consistent skills across people

    When teams must operate with shared methods, training helps reduce variability. Even experienced people may need the same baseline so their work is comparable.

    3) You can’t “prove it” yet with enough real tasks

    If you don’t have a track record for a particular responsibility, a well-chosen credential or program can demonstrate readiness-especially when paired with a portfolio of small, supervised outcomes.

    4) The work involves safety, quality, or standards

    In roles where mistakes are costly (for example: high-quality processes, regulated environments, or complex customer-facing work), training can signal that you’ve learned the rules of the road.

    When experience carries more weight

    Experience tends to matter more when the role rewards judgment, execution under constraints, and context-dependent problem solving.

    1) The work is highly situational

    If success depends on navigating stakeholder dynamics, ambiguous requirements, or shifting priorities, on-the-job experience is often the strongest indicator.

    2) Results and reliability matter more than theory

    Employers can learn a lot from patterns: how you deliver, how you handle feedback, and how you recover from mistakes. Those patterns are typically visible only through real work.

    3) You need confidence through “repeat exposure”

    Training teaches concepts. Experience teaches muscle memory: what matters first, what to double-check, and how to avoid predictable failure points.

    4) The role evolves quickly

    In fast-changing contexts, experience shows that you can adapt-without waiting for the next course update.

    How to combine both in a development plan

    The most practical strategy is to treat training as support for work, not a replacement for it.

    Goal Training move Experience move Proof you can show
    Master a new method Short course or guided learning Apply it to a real project Before/after outcomes + feedback
    Improve quality and reliability Review standards, templates, best practices Run a small improvement cycle Reduced rework, clearer deliverables
    Strengthen communication Training focused on stakeholder communication Lead a briefing or report-out Stakeholder notes + next-step clarity

    If you’re not sure where to start, begin by mapping your current responsibilities and the skills they imply. For a structured approach, explore mes besoins en compétences and consider how it can feed into a training plan.

    Also, when you prepare to request support (training time, budget, or a development project), a clear conversation guide can help. See et si on parlait formation.

    Questions to ask before choosing a path

    Use these questions as a quick filter:

    • What exactly needs to improve-knowledge, practice, or confidence?
    • What does “good” look like in this role (deliverables, behaviors, standards)?
    • What evidence will the employer accept: certificates, projects, references, metrics, or observed behavior?
    • How quickly do I need results-and what can I realistically test within 4-8 weeks?
    • What constraints do I have (time, access to projects, coaching, supervisor support)?
    • What is the smallest experiment that connects learning to work?

    Rule of thumb: training without application often fades; application without learning can stall at the same level. The goal is a loop: learn → try → get feedback → improve → repeat.

    Conclusion: progress comes from the loop, not the label

    When people ask “training or experience,” they’re usually asking “what will move my career forward?” The most reliable answer is not an either-or choice. It’s a balance shaped by the role’s context:

    • Choose more training when you need structured knowledge, shared standards, or a faster entry ramp.
    • Choose more experience when judgment, reliability, and context are the differentiators.
    • Combine both by turning each learning step into a real project and collecting proof through feedback and outcomes.

    If you want to keep moving step by step, revisit your skills map periodically and align your next “learning” with one concrete work goal. And if you’re ready to discuss development with your employer, start with a clear, respectful plan.


    External reading: For general guidance on skills and learning in the workforce, see OECD learning-for-jobs and CIPD factsheets.